Home
Spectators
Alan Kohler

Robert Gottliebsen

Stephen Bartholomeusz

Stephen Koukoulas

Jessica Irvine

Rob Burgess

Steve Keen

Michael Gawenda

Oliver Marc Hartwich

Ben Potter

John Lee

Tristan Edis

Supratim Adhikari

Jackson Hewett

The Distillery

Scoreboard

Keith Orchison

The Conversation
Alan Kohler
Alan Kohler is one of Australia’s most experienced commentators and journalists. Alan is the founder of Eureka Report, Australia’s most successful investment newsletter, and Business Spectator, a 24-hour free business news and commentary website. He also hosts Inside Business, a half-hour Sunday programme on the ABC, is the finance presenter on the ABC News - and producer of the nightly graph (or two).
Economy
Australian News

Global News
European Crisis

Global Financial Crisis

US Economy

Asian Economy

China

Commodities

Interest Rates

Tax

Productivity

Leadership

Innovation

Reserve Bank of Australia
Latest stories
WEEKEND ECONOMIST: Slip, slipping away
The federal budget revealed a worrying trend for the Australian economy, with disinflation a factor in the revenue slippage that led to the deficit.
Delinking indicators warn of a fractured system
The long-standing correlation in global economic data is being challenged. It reveals profound tensions underneath the world's central bank-inspired stability.
Markets
ASX
ASX Indices

Major ASX stocks

Markets Spectator

Breakfast Deals

Currency

ETFs
Latest stories
MARKETS: Riding the emotional waves
Hedge fund manager David Hobart says the key to investing is being aware of the emotions that drive markets – and how you manage your own.
MARKETS SPECTATOR: The local yield story is over
Tim Toohey says yield hungry investors will search outside Australia for markets that offer better returns.
Politics
Australian Election

Federal Budget

International News
Asia

Europe

USA

National Affairs
Latest stories
A subtle shift for Abbott's razor gang
After months of campaigning against 'wasteful' Labor management, Tony Abbott will be aware similar scrutiny will apply to his government, should the Coalition win.
WEEKEND ECONOMIST: Slip, slipping away
The federal budget revealed a worrying trend for the Australian economy, with disinflation a factor in the revenue slippage that led to the deficit.
Technology
NBN Buzz

Mobility

BYOD

Smart Devices

Emerging Tech

Applications

Big Data

Cloud Computing

Data Management

Reviews

Social Media

Start-ups

Security

Data Security

Identity Management

Wireless Security

Telecommunication
Latest stories
Why Google Music's stuck on repeat
Google's new product announcements typically impress. But this latest announcement about Google Music shows that the company is happy to copy other incumbents and not blaze its own path in the digital music scene.
The evolution of the social media advisor
The newly created role of the social media adviser is one shrouded in mystery. Part PR, part digital media specialist, it's yet to fully understand its place in Australian politics.
Climate
Carbon markets

Energy markets

Renewable energy

Resources

Solar energy

Wind power

CleanTech

Science & Environment

Green Deals

Policy & Politics

Smart Energy
Latest stories
Is this the end for Labor's 'CarbonChoices'?
Whispers in Canberra suggest Bill Shorten is canvassing the numbers for support on a huge Labor carbon pricing backflip after the election.
Obama's climate agenda nears judgment day
The US Supreme Court's decision whether to take up any of the petitions against climate change regulations could shape or shatter the Obama administration's efforts to solidify its climate change agenda.
Industries
Advertising and Marketing

Agribusiness

Automotive

Aviation

Construction and Engineering

Education

Family Business

Financial Services

Food and Beverages

Gaming and Racing

Health and Pharmaceuticals

HR

Industrial relations

Information Technology

Infrastructure

Insurance

Manufacturing

Media and Digital

Resources and Energy

Professional Services

Property

Retail

Telecommunications

Transport and Logistics

Small Business (SME)

Tourism
Video
CEO Hub

KGBTV

Leadership Lab

Management Insights

Young Leaders

EurekaTV
Latest videos

How to build a service business in China

King and Wood Malleson's China Partner David Olsson explains how Australian companies can tap into the huge demand...

KGB: ANZ CEO , Mike Smith

KGB: Mike Smith
Knowledge Centre
Investment Tips

Webinars

eBooks
Featured stories
Download the December CEO Pulse survey
CEOs outline changing views on corporate spending and profits, their economic expectations and political dissatisfaction, including advice for Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott.

TECHNOLOGY SPECTATOR: The audacious app trying to take over TV
UK-based Zeebox wants to be the intermediary for all social media-television interactions. It will not only have to lure viewers, but the networks themselves.

CLIMATE SPECTATOR: Coal crash coming?

Paul Gilding18 Nov 2010, 6:55 AM

What's going on when the IEA chooses to prick the coal bubble by predicting demand will peak by 2020 and drop to 2003 levels by 2035? And what does it mean for industry and investors?

You must be logged in to read this article

Not a member yet? Register today ›

Business Spectator is available on all of your devices so you can access the latest news and commentary where and how you like

Register now ›

Climate Spectator

The very conservative International Energy Agency has just released its closely watched annual World Energy Outlook (WEO), with forecasts for the structure of the energy market through to 2035. This year’s WEO was much anticipated, given the pace of developments in renewables and climate policy, and it didn’t disappoint. The report included the IEA’s interpretation of what major governments’ commitment to a 2°C temperature target would mean for the energy market. The contrast with what most market players assume, particularly coal companies, could hardly be more dramatic.

One global coal player, Peabody, recently told the World Coal Conference that it assumes demand for coal will increase by over 50 per cent by 2030. The IEA on the other hand tells us that if we are to have a reasonable chance of limiting warming to 2°C degrees, coal demand will have to peak by 2020, and by 2035 will have dropped to levels last seen in 2003. These are dramatically different views of the market and the implications for company valuations, and therefore for investors and corporate strategy, are considerable.

The same report compares coal and oil’s current 46 per cent share of global electricity generation to what it would be in 2030 under the 2°C degree scenario. The answer is just 22 per cent. The difference would be picked up by low CO2 energy, nuclear and renewables, which would see massive growth. They assume non-hydro renewables would go from 3 per cent to 20 per cent, all the more remarkable given the assumed 50 per cent increase in overall energy demand numbers. Interestingly, despite this demand growth, even the total amount of coal-generated electricity would fall in absolute terms.

The significant thing about these forecasts is that the IEA has generally been considered to be excessively conservative and largely aligned with the views that dominate the fossil fuel industry. Indeed, the Peabody forecasts referred to above reference an earlier IEA WEO report. So what’s going on when this industry friendly body chooses to prick the coal bubble? And what does it all mean for investors and resource companies?

What it means is the coal industry is headed for a crash. This is heresy in the industry and would be dismissed by some as starry-eyed naivety. But the numbers don’t lie and this issue has cold hard rational numbers all over it.

One of these numbers is 2°C. There are many uncertainties in the detail of climate science, but there is clear consensus on that number. It is the line in the sand scientists have drawn and said, if we go past it we face catastrophic system-wide risk. While some scientists argue that number is too high and too risky, none of any consequence argue it is too low. That’s why the governments of China, India, Europe and the USA have all agreed, along with many global corporates, that 2°C is the line we can’t cross.

Not crossing it requires the numbers in the IEA report to be achieved. This is hard science. If you put any more CO2 in the atmosphere than that, we will almost certainly be heading past 3-4°C. The economic consequences of that would make the collapse of the coal industry look like a picnic. The science also tells us, supported now by the IEA, that the decision will be made this decade, by action or lack of it.

Further complicating assumptions of growth is a very interesting analysis published today in Nature by two well regarded US energy experts, Richard Heinberg and David Fridley. Their article, "The End of Cheap Coal,” calls into question assumptions of endless supplies of cheap coal, using much of the same logic as earlier predictions around the end of cheap oil. It’s worth remembering that those who have been predicting the end of cheap oil since the late 90s, including Heinberg, were ridiculed for many years.

Now even the IEA supports that view with comments like "the era of cheap energy is over”. The new analysis in Nature suggests there may be a similar dynamic at play with coal, with reserves constantly being revised downwards as time passes. They also remind us that industry has a history of getting their forecasts wrong, noting that for oil, "the current price of more than $US80 per barrel is about three times higher than the upper range in official forecasts for 2010 that were being issued in the late 1990s.” Like oil, the issue is not that we are running out, but volatile and rising prices as the peak level of supply is reached.

But aren’t rising coal prices good for the coal industry? Isn’t this good news for them? The answer is surprising – and this is where the two issues combine. In the short term the answer is yes, but ultimately higher prices will trigger the death of coal. Everyone knows the only way coal can survive in the low-carbon world that science says we must now have, is if carbon capture (CCS) technology can make coal a zero CO2 energy source. The economic viability of CCS is already questionable and is rapidly losing support, but if it is ever to work it can only do so with cheap coal.

This is because the additional cost of CCS equipment and CO2 pipelines, along with the inherent loss of efficiency involved in its use, means that if coal prices rise, renewables will become cheaper than coal with CCS. So if Heinberg and Fridley are right, coal prices will increase, CCS will be uneconomic and renewables will take over. This, of course, will then see coal prices drop again. But it seems likely, by then, that the market will have shifted its focus to renewables, and perhaps nuclear, with coal unlikely to recover given renewables prices will keep falling.

So why do Peabody and so many others assume levels of growth that are in such contrast to this hard logic of both the market and climate science?

Firstly, of course, because they want it be so. They sell coal and the more they can convince the market of an endless coal boom, the higher their share price. This is particularly so for resource companies that are heavily or exclusively reliant on coal like Peabody. Self-interest is a powerful driver of denial. But it’s more complicated than that.

What these people and their investors are falling for, supported by many people in government, is what I call the "economic inertia trap”. This is the belief that something that is big and moving in a certain direction will continue to do so. They simply can’t imagine the level of change required to shift that inertia could possibly occur. Coal is cheap and plentiful, people need lots of energy, so coal will be burnt. This is delusion on a grand scale. Does anyone really believe society will calmly stand by as we head towards 3°C, then 4°C, staring economic and social collapse in the face while we focus on cheap energy as some kind of overriding objective?

Let there be no doubt, we will act on climate change – and when we do, the coal industry will face an almighty crash, as Phil Preston and I argued when we recently released our paper on the financial implications of all this. Probably not this year or next, but we think before the end of this decade.

But don’t expect Peabody or their friends to come on board early. Horse and cart companies didn’t become auto companies. Amazon reshaped the book retailing business before book retailers woke up. Kodak failed to be ready for digital photography, and so on. So we can safely expect the coal companies to stay in denial all the way to the finish line – or in their case, their finished line. That is their choice to make. It is also their investors’ choice on whether to go with them or when to jump. The clock is now ticking.

This article first appeared on Climate Spectator on November 12.

The Spectators

A subtle shift for Abbott's razor gang
Mitchell Neems 17 May, 7:33 PM | 6
After months of campaigning against 'wasteful' Labor management, Tony Abbott will be aware similar scrutiny will apply to his government, should the Coalition win.
WEEKEND ECONOMIST: Slip, slipping away
Bill Evans 17 May, 6:50 PM | 7
The federal budget revealed a worrying trend for the Australian economy, with disinflation a factor in the revenue slippage that led to the deficit.
Broken Glass won't hurt gung-ho Google
Ben Shepherd 17 May, 5:57 PM
So far Google Glass has been underwhelmingly modeled by unfashionable white men. But Google continues to outshine its tech-giant peers in the media with its boldness to innovate.

Index	Last	Chg	% Chg
DOW JONES	15354.40	+121.2	+0.8
S&P 500	1667.47	+17	+1
NASDAQ	3498.97	+33.7	+1
FTSE 100	6723.06	+35.3	+0.5
NIKKEI	15138.12	+100.9	+0.7
Hang Seng	23082.68	+38.4	+0.2

Latest stories

Latest stories

Latest stories

Latest stories

Latest stories

Latest videos

Featured stories

CLIMATE SPECTATOR: Coal crash coming?

You must be logged in to read this article

Not a member yet? Register today ›

Already a member? Sign in here

More from Paul Gilding

Related articles

More from Business Spectator

Information

Policies

Advertising

BS Main menu

User login