Alan Kohler is one of Australia’s most experienced commentators and journalists. Alan is the founder of Eureka Report, Australia’s most successful investment newsletter, and Business Spectator, a 24-hour free business news and commentary website. He also hosts Inside Business, a half-hour Sunday programme on the ABC, is the finance presenter on the ABC News - and producer of the nightly graph (or two).
Both sides of politics have an interest in pretending Australian prosperity was their handiwork. But before long, global headwinds will reveal Australia’s true position.
Reports by the Parliamentary Budget Office and Treasury confirmed Labor has blown out a structural budget deficit that began under John Howard's government, and the next government has quite a job on its hands.
The political stoush about how much bandwidth Australians might need in the coming years threatens to stifle the conversation needed to deliver the services of the future.
This week China has outlined details of its first carbon trading scheme while its National Development and Reform Commission has recommended an absolute cap on emissions. The moves represent major signs of progress.
In theory, carbon capture would allow energy producers to continue to burn fossil fuels while meeting emissions targets. In practice, the technology is expensive and unproven.
CEOs outline changing views on corporate spending and profits, their economic expectations and political dissatisfaction, including advice for Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott.
UK-based Zeebox wants to be the intermediary for all social media-television interactions. It will not only have to lure viewers, but the networks themselves.
The introduction of covered bonds to Australia is a beneficial but piecemeal approach to reform. What's really needed is a full root and branch review of our financial system.
Great Joe, that's one idea, what about a massive sovereign wealth fund based on a proportion of the company tax received (Half shielded by covered bonds, October 14). No need to reduce the company tax rate as it's similar to that imposed by developed countries with welfare and advanced medical services. With the Norwegan wealth fund there are restrictions that limit the amount any government can draw down in the life of any parliament - so another government can't get ther hands on it. I think you should have a crack at caps on middle class welfare - manup and cap the amount of tax free income a superannuate can draw down. I think It's a disgrace that some people with millions in super are paying no tax - you could then raise the tax free allocation on income tax. There's your homework for the weekend - get cracking.
S A,
I think this is a truly horrific development (Half shielded by covered bonds, October 14). What is not made clear is that deposit holders in these banks are now exposed to losses when the 'assets' go bad.
The fact that this has bipartisan sponsorship is all the more scary.
Evan Jones,
On the contrary.
Covered bonds are a disaster, presaging a legal quagmire in a future banking crisis.
Covered bonds turn liabilities (depositors' funds) into an asset.
The baseness of this move merely reinforces the reality of the power of the Big 4 over Canberra.
A 'full root and branch review into the Australian financial system' is long overdue, but its main function would be to re-examine the failures induced by the Campbell and Wallis reviews.
Eryl Allder,
It is of great concern to me that if the government guarantees individual deposits of up to $250,000 then in effect the government is the real guarantor of covered bonds (Half shielded by covered bonds, October 14).
I don't know what other assets banks have apart from all the mortgages they hold and thus does this mean that peoples' homes can be handed over to covered bond holders as well as depositors' money? Do our banks really need another source of funding? I thought they were awash with people's savings now.
Xy,
Joe, I think this is a good summary of covered bonds (Half shielded by covered bonds, October 14). I have heard the term before but never understood what it means.
Comments on this article
Comments PolicyGreat Joe, that's one idea, what about a massive sovereign wealth fund based on a proportion of the company tax received (Half shielded by covered bonds, October 14). No need to reduce the company tax rate as it's similar to that imposed by developed countries with welfare and advanced medical services. With the Norwegan wealth fund there are restrictions that limit the amount any government can draw down in the life of any parliament - so another government can't get ther hands on it. I think you should have a crack at caps on middle class welfare - manup and cap the amount of tax free income a superannuate can draw down. I think It's a disgrace that some people with millions in super are paying no tax - you could then raise the tax free allocation on income tax. There's your homework for the weekend - get cracking.
I think this is a truly horrific development (Half shielded by covered bonds, October 14). What is not made clear is that deposit holders in these banks are now exposed to losses when the 'assets' go bad.
The fact that this has bipartisan sponsorship is all the more scary.
On the contrary.
Covered bonds are a disaster, presaging a legal quagmire in a future banking crisis.
Covered bonds turn liabilities (depositors' funds) into an asset.
The baseness of this move merely reinforces the reality of the power of the Big 4 over Canberra.
A 'full root and branch review into the Australian financial system' is long overdue, but its main function would be to re-examine the failures induced by the Campbell and Wallis reviews.
It is of great concern to me that if the government guarantees individual deposits of up to $250,000 then in effect the government is the real guarantor of covered bonds (Half shielded by covered bonds, October 14).
I don't know what other assets banks have apart from all the mortgages they hold and thus does this mean that peoples' homes can be handed over to covered bond holders as well as depositors' money? Do our banks really need another source of funding? I thought they were awash with people's savings now.
Joe, I think this is a good summary of covered bonds (Half shielded by covered bonds, October 14). I have heard the term before but never understood what it means.