Regulating Skype the hard way

The French regulator has reignited its war with Skype and the case is an example of the uncertainty that surrounds the definition and regulation of VoIP services.

More from Luca Shiavoni

Comments on this article

Comments Policy
Michael Elling,

Both sides in the debate need to understand the internet began in the late 1980s because of a Baby Bell monopoly price response to the competitive WAN/IXC threat in the US. By going to flat-rate expanded local calling area to counter the digitized, metered, AIN bypass threat to their local switching and intrastate monopoly revenues.

Repeat after me: "the internet was an artifact of the monopoly bell system". The concept of "free" was not the openness that everyone thinks, rather the flat-rate, all-you-can-eat pricing of the Baby Bells trying to prevent loss of the analog-priced, government sustained unnatural last mile monopoly.

By now, we (academics, regulators, trade mgmt and capitalists) should have learned that the market is going horizontal. The vertically integrated service provider model cannot efficiently and effectively clear rapidly depreciating supply at every layer and boundary point across rapidly shifting and growing demand. Only horizontally scaled intranets can.

We need to think of lower layer ecosystems defined as "infrastructure as a service" or IaaS. Middle or control layer ecosystems will be "software as a service" or SaaS. Finally, upper layer systems will be "applications as a service" or AaaS.

From a regulatory perspective we need to merely ensure that these layers remain relatively open and generative and that no one group or collective gets greater than 50% share. The market will take care of the rest given the nearly infinite supply and demand opportunities that await us.